Greenland’s ruling Siumut party has reversed its plan to push forward with an independence referendum. Initially, the party had announced that it would activate Article 21 of the Self-Government Act with Denmark, thereby initiating negotiations for a referendum on Greenland’s independence.
However, mounting internal dissent, widespread public skepticism, and rising international concerns – also due to the President Donald Trump’s controversial claim that he would take the island “by force”—have forced the party to reconsider its strategy ahead of the early elections scheduled for March 11.
Greenland’s path to independence
Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark with a population of approximately 56,000, has long been at the heart of discussions on self-determination and national identity.
The Siumut party aimed to fast-track the independence process by invoking Article 21 (paragraf 21), a legal provision allowing immediate negotiations with Denmark. This decisive step was expected to pave the way for a referendum that could significantly alter Greenland’s political and economic future, especially as global interest in the Arctic region intensifies.
Internal party dynamics and public debate
Recent internal conflicts and public debate have placed the Siumut leadership under intense scrutiny. Influential party members, notably Kuno Fencker—whose recent departure from the party has attracted considerable attention—have voiced concerns over the timing and risks associated with the referendum. Party chairman Erik Jensen underscored the need for caution during a recent debate:
“We must begin with investigations, which will be finished in two years, and from there one must see whether we should activate paragraph 21 or not. But it must of course be reassuring for the entire population.”
During the same debate, Jensen reiterated:
“Siumut should not be called afraid to take the next step.”
Geopolitical tensions and international repercussions
The debate over Greenland’s independence is set against a backdrop of escalating geopolitical tensions. The strategic importance of the Arctic has never been higher, and provocative statements from international figures, including Trump’s assertion of a forceful takeover, have only intensified concerns.
The prospect of holding a referendum during such a volatile period has led many to question whether the timing is appropriate, given the potential risks to Greenland’s stability and economic well-being.
A cautious approach to Greenland sovereignty
In light of these challenges, Siumut now plans to conduct comprehensive investigations over the next two years before deciding whether to activate Article 21 (paragraf 21). This deliberate pause is designed to ensure that any future move towards independence is supported by robust research and enjoys broad public consensus. As early elections on March 11 approach, this strategic retreat reflects both the internal divisions within Siumut and the broader concerns about pursuing a critical national decision amidst global uncertainties.
This development marks a significant turning point in Greenland’s political landscape, potentially setting the stage for a more cautious and measured debate on independence in the coming years.
