Early this morning in Copenhagen, activists gathered at Maersk’s headquarters. They protest the company’s alleged delivery of military-related equipment to Israel. Organized by the Palestinian Youth Movement, the demonstration has drawn local and international attention amid escalating tensions.
Activists demand an end to military equipment transport
Protesters insist that Maersk halt all transports of military-related equipment to Israel. According to the campaign’s website, Mask off Maersk, activists argue that the shipments indirectly facilitate what they describe as Israel’s genocide against the Palestinian people. One demonstrator declared:
“We are not waiting for a decision from the top to stop the flow of weapons to Israel, but we demand it from the bottom.”
Banners held by the crowd include slogans such as “break the connection to genocide!” (in Danish “bryd forbindelsen til folkemord!”).
Dramatic demonstrations and Tactics
Images from the scene show protestors climbing onto the building’s roof near the main entrance at Esplanaden. The gathering was reported to have approached 1.000 participants, although official figures remain unconfirmed.
Notably, Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among those present.
Police later told TV2 that 22 people had been arrested for domestic violence and trespassing.
Police intervention and use of force
As the protest progressed, police intervened after demonstrators refused to vacate the area. Authorities issued a firm order to disperse, stating:
“The action has not been reported to the police, the activists are staying illegally on the area, and the company’s operations are significantly disrupted by the blockade.”
When protesters did not comply, officers initiated a clearing operation using physical force and tear gas. Rasmus Nielsen, a spokesperson for Copenhagen Police, explained:
“We ensure that the demonstration can express itself, but they must also comply with current legislation.”
Maersk’s response and official clarifications
In response to the mounting criticism, Maersk clarified that the company does not transport weapons or ammunition to Israel but only “military-related equipment.” According to the firm, the cargo—shipped on behalf of the American state—is fully screened, legal, and in accordance with current U.S. policies under the American-Israeli security cooperation program.
This distinction has become a central point of contention, as activists accuse the shipping giant of indirectly contributing to what they label as a humanitarian crisis.
The role of corporate in global conflicts
The protest at Maersk’s headquarters highlights deep divisions over the role of corporate logistics in global conflicts. With voices from international figures like Greta Thunberg joining the call, the demonstration underscores a broader demand for accountability and a reexamination of how military equipment is transported in an increasingly polarized geopolitical landscape.
